Current:Home > NewsAbortion rights to be decided at the ballot box after Ohio voters reject Issue 1 -InvestTomorrow
Abortion rights to be decided at the ballot box after Ohio voters reject Issue 1
View
Date:2025-04-27 12:41:52
Ohio voters issued a temporary reprieve to abortion-rights supporters Tuesday when they rejected a proposal to make it harder to amend the state constitution.
But an expensive, nasty fight over abortion access in Ohio is only beginning.
Roughly 57% of voters said no to Issue 1, according to unofficial results. If passed, the measure would have required 60% of voters to enact new amendments − instead of a simple majority − and changed the signature-gathering process for citizen amendments.
Tuesday's election was aimed squarely at defeating the abortion rights measure in November. GOP politicians said as much.
Republican state Rep. Brian Stewart, wrote in a letter to fellow GOP lawmakers last year: “After decades of Republicans’ work to make Ohio a pro-life state, the Left intends to write abortion on demand into Ohio’s Constitution. If they succeed, all the work we accomplished by multiple Republican majorities will be undone…”
The 60% threshold was strategic as well. In 2022, Michigan approved an abortion rights measure with 56.7% of the vote. Recent polling in Ohio suggests nearly 58% of voters support the reproductive rights proposal.
But in the end, Ohioans rejected Republicans' attempt to change the rules for constitutional amendments.
No easy victory
Issue 1's defeat is good news for backers of the abortion-rights measure, but it doesn’t ensure an easy victory in November.
Ohio is the only state voting on abortion rights this year, making it the epicenter of the fight over reproductive rights just over a year after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.
Since that decision, voters in Michigan, California and Vermont approved measures to protect abortion access while voters in Kentucky, Kansas and Montana rejected stricter abortion restrictions.
"Now, Ohioans will turn their focus to rejecting extremism and government control to ensure families have the freedom to make decisions that are best for them," said Rhiannon Carnes, spokeswoman for Ohioans United for Reproductive Rights. "Ohioans believe that abortion is a personal, private decision that should be up to them and their families without government meddling in their business."
Tens of millions of dollars will be spent on both sides of this political battle, including out-of-state money and secretive dark money. Supporters of the amendment estimate they will spend about $35 million on their campaign; opponents haven’t thrown out a number. Both groups were also active in the campaign for and against Issue 1.
The ads will be pointed and personal. Opponents of the measure have already focused on parental rights and anti-transgender advertising to paint the proposal as too extreme for Ohioans. They are targeting not only people who oppose abortion access but those who might back it under certain circumstances.
Proponents must convince Ohioans that this proposal is measured and tailored to a Midwest voting bloc largely uncomfortable with abortions later in pregnancy.
Support for abortion rights doesn’t break down perfectly along political party lines and often exists on a spectrum with voters backing abortions at a set point in pregnancy or under certain circumstances.
Statewide, nearly 58% of Ohio voters said they would back the abortion rights amendment, including 81% of Democrats and 32% of Republicans, according to a recent USA TODAY Network Ohio/Suffolk University poll.
What would the abortion amendment do?
The proposed amendment would protect access to abortion and other reproductive decisions through viability, which is when a doctor determines a fetus can survive outside the uterus with reasonable measures. That is typically 23 to 24 weeks into pregnancy. Abortions could be performed after that point to save the patient’s life or health.
That stands in contrast to the slew of abortion bans and restrictions Ohio’s GOP-controlled Legislature has passed over the past decade. The most restrictive was a ban on doctors performing abortions about six weeks after someone's last menstrual period.
That 2019 law was in effect for 82 days following the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in 2022 sending abortion decisions back to the states. Fewer patients had abortions in Ohio during that 2 1/2 month period; about 400 traveled out-of-state to have an abortion.
That law is now on hold as the Ohio Supreme Court − which is dominated by Republicans − reviews some aspects of the case. It’s not clear when the justices will issue a decision.
"I think the law is sound," Ohio Right to Life President Mike Gonidakis said. "I think the Ohio Supreme Court will rule in our favor, ultimately. That may be before November or after November, but we've got to win first in November."
In the meantime, Republican lawmakers have not passed anything to either clarify that 2019 law or eliminate abortion entirely. Gov. Mike DeWine encouraged lawmakers to look at whether that law, which he signed, was "sustainable."
It remains to be seen whether that's on the Legislature's priority list this fall.
veryGood! (9)
Related
- DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
- Rafah crossing: Why are people, aid stuck at Egypt-Gaza border?
- Death Grips reportedly quits show after being hit by glowsticks: 'Bands are not robots'
- Musk’s X tests $1 fee for new users in the Philippines and New Zealand in bid to target spam
- Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
- Former AP videojournalist Yaniv Zohar killed in Hamas attack at home with his family
- Tyga files for sole custody of his son with Blac Chyna, King Cairo
- Koolaburra by UGG Sale: Keep Your Toes Toasty With Up to 55% Off on Boots, Slippers & More
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- 37 years after Florida nurse brutally murdered in her home, DNA analysis helps police identify killer
Ranking
- Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
- South Africa hopes to ease crippling blackouts as major power station recovers
- Rafah crossing: Why are people, aid stuck at Egypt-Gaza border?
- Oklahoma school bus driver faces kidnapping charges after refusing to let students leave
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- Kansas isn't ranked in preseason women's college basketball poll. Who else got snubbed?
- China’s Xi promises more market openness and new investments for Belt and Road projects
- Guatemala Cabinet minister steps down after criticism for not acting forcefully against protesters
Recommendation
Toyota to invest $922 million to build a new paint facility at its Kentucky complex
Mayor denies discussing absentee ballots with campaign volunteer at center of ballot stuffing claims
‘Not knowing’ plunges the families of Israel’s missing into a limbo of pain and numbness
Argentina vs. Peru live updates: Will Lionel Messi play in World Cup qualifying match?
Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
Belgian officials raise terror alert level after 2 Swedes fatally shot in Brussels
Kansas isn't ranked in preseason women's college basketball poll. Who else got snubbed?
UK national, South African and local guide killed in an attack near a Ugandan national park